Sustainable Agriculture

Home / Research / Sustainable Agriculture

The Challenge

Modern agriculture faces mounting pressures: water scarcity exacerbated by climate change, soil degradation from intensive cultivation, and the need to maintain or increase productivity for a growing population. Business-as-usual approaches—intensive tillage, bare fallow periods, synthetic inputs—are increasingly unsustainable.

Our research evaluates conservation practices that work with natural soil processes rather than against them. We focus on understanding the physical mechanisms by which these practices affect soil function, particularly water dynamics and soil structure.

Key Research Areas

1. Cover Cropping Systems

Cover crops—plants grown primarily to benefit the soil rather than for harvest—are a cornerstone of sustainable agriculture. Our long-term field studies (24+ years) investigate how cover crops affect:

Physical Effects of Cover Crops

  • Soil structure: Increase macroaggregate formation and stability
  • Hydraulic conductivity: Marginal improvements to water infiltration
  • Water retention: Slight changes to plant-available water capacity
  • Pore size distribution: More macropores, better aeration
  • Carbon distribution: Rapid incorporation into large aggregates

Importantly, our research reveals that benefits appear quickly (1 season) for soil structure but take much longer (decades) for measurable carbon sequestration. This suggests managing expectations for carbon credits while emphasizing more reliable co-benefits.

2. Reduced and No-Till Systems

Tillage disrupts soil structure, breaks aggregates, and accelerates organic matter decomposition. No-till and reduced tillage aim to preserve soil structure, but trade-offs exist:

Benefits of No-Till:
  • Preserves aggregate stability and macropore networks
  • Reduces erosion and runoff
  • Improves water infiltration over time (5-10+ years)
  • Decreases fuel and labor costs
Challenges:
  • May initially reduce water content at field capacity
  • Can increase soil compaction if not managed carefully
  • Weed management requires alternative strategies
  • Benefits take years to fully manifest

Our studies comparing 24-year no-till vs. standard-till systems show clear improvements in soil structure under no-till, but surprisingly complex effects on water storage that depend on dynamic flow processes rather than static retention curves.

3. Irrigation Efficiency & Water Management

California agriculture faces chronic water scarcity. High-efficiency irrigation systems (drip, microsprinklers) dramatically reduce water application compared to furrow irrigation. But what are the soil health implications?

Unexpected Findings on Irrigation

Our research challenges conventional wisdom:

  • High-efficiency systems may reduce soil organic carbon accumulation compared to furrow irrigation
  • Reduced wetting-drying cycles under drip irrigation can limit aggregate formation
  • When combined with cover crops, effects are complex and context-dependent
  • Water savings must be balanced against potential long-term soil health impacts

4. Organic Amendments: Biochar & Compost

Adding organic materials to soil can improve fertility and structure. We investigate:

Biochar:
  • Almond shell biochar as a locally-available amendment in California
  • Effects on soil physical properties (bulk density, porosity)
  • Water retention changes
  • Application rate optimization
  • Long-term stability and carbon sequestration potential
Compost:
  • UC Merced Climate Action composting initiative
  • Recycling organic waste to improve campus soils
  • Educational opportunities for sustainable practices

California-Specific Challenges

Mediterranean Climate Adaptations

California's Mediterranean climate (wet winters, dry summers) creates unique challenges:

  • Long dry periods limit decomposition and carbon cycling
  • Wetting-drying cycles differ from humid-region agriculture
  • Soil organic matter dynamics diverge from temperate-region research

Our findings show that cover crop residue incorporation doesn't follow patterns observed in Midwest or Eastern US agriculture, necessitating California-specific research and recommendations.

Water Scarcity Constraints

Every practice must be evaluated through the lens of water availability:

  • Can cover crops be grown with minimal additional water?
  • Do structural improvements from conservation practices improve water use efficiency enough to justify adoption?
  • How do practices perform during drought years?

Integrating Multiple Practices

Conservation agriculture is not a single practice but a systems approach. We study combinations:

  • No-till + cover crops: Synergistic effects on structure
  • Cover crops + high-efficiency irrigation: Complex interactions
  • Biochar + reduced tillage: Long-term carbon benefits

Understanding interactions is critical because benefits (and challenges) of combined practices are not simply additive.

Measuring Soil Health

"Soil health" is a holistic concept. We measure specific physical indicators:

  • Aggregate stability: Resistance to breakdown by water
  • Infiltration rate: How quickly water enters soil
  • Bulk density: Soil compaction indicator
  • Pore size distribution: Balance of large and small pores
  • Water retention: Plant-available water capacity
  • Hydraulic conductivity: Saturated and unsaturated flow rates

These physical measurements complement chemical (nutrient availability, pH) and biological (microbial biomass, respiration) indicators to provide a comprehensive soil health assessment.

From Research to Practice

Long-Term Commitment Required

A consistent theme across our research: conservation practices require patience. Structural improvements take 5-10 years, carbon sequestration even longer. Short-term trials may miss benefits or overemphasize challenges.

Context Matters

No single prescription works everywhere. Effectiveness depends on:

  • Soil texture (clay vs. sandy soils respond differently)
  • Climate (practices suited to humid regions may fail in Mediterranean climates)
  • Crop rotation (some cover crops integrate better with certain cash crops)
  • Economic constraints (equipment, labor, market access)

Co-Benefits Beyond Carbon

While carbon sequestration generates headlines, more reliable benefits include:

  • Reduced erosion and sediment pollution
  • Improved water infiltration and reduced runoff
  • Enhanced resilience to drought and heavy rainfall
  • Reduced need for tillage and associated costs

Current & Future Research

  • Multi-decadal datasets: Continuing to monitor our 24+ year field experiments
  • Climate change adaptation: How will practices perform under warmer, more variable rainfall?
  • Precision agriculture integration: Spatial variability in conservation practice benefits
  • Economic viability: Partnering with agricultural economists to quantify costs and benefits

Recent Publications

  • Impact of almond shell biochar properties and application rate on soil physical and hydraulic characteristics.
    Thao, T., Lopez, V. D., Gonzales, M., Berhe, A. A., Diaz, G., & Ghezzehei, T. A.
    Sustainable Environment, 11(1), 2485688. 2025.

    Details BibTeX

    Abstract

    We conducted two 64-day incubation experiments to assess how locally produced almond-shell biochar influences soil physical and hydraulic properties. Biochar was created using slow pyrolysis at different temperatures (350 °C or 700 °C), separated into different particle sizes (<250 μm or 1–2 mm), and applied at 10 ton/ha or 60 ton/ha to a coarse-textured soil. While our analysis shows that biochar yielded greater cation exchange capacity (CEC) and specific surface area (SSA) with increasing pyrolysis temperature and finer particle size, its contributions to improving soil hydraulic properties were marginal. In the first experiment, the addition of biochar at high rates slightly improved water stable aggregate (WSA) (3.8%–5.3% increase) but has no effect on saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat). Soil respiration measured throughout the experiment were not significantly different among treatments. In the second experiment, the addition of biochar increased soil infiltration rate at the initial stage (8.18E–4 cm/s), but this effect diminished over time. WSA was lower for biochar amended soil and lowest at high application rates (5%–21% reduction). Cumulative carbon dioxide (CO2) flux varied between biochar particle sizes and rates. Additionally, a significant difference between the two experiments was also observed, with cumulative CO2 (38%–56% greater) and WSA (11%–40%) being inversely correlated. Our findings suggest that almond-shell derived biochar has a limited impact on arable loamy sand soil properties, specifically for water retention under short-term conditions.

    BibTeX

    @article{Thao31122025,
      author = {Thao, Touyee and Lopez, Vivian D. and Gonzales, Melinda and Berhe, Asmeret A. and Diaz, Gerardo and Ghezzehei, Teamrat A.},
      title = {Impact of almond shell biochar properties and application rate on soil physical and hydraulic characteristics},
      journal = {Sustainable Environment},
      volume = {11},
      number = {1},
      pages = {2485688},
      year = {2025},
      publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
      doi = {10.1080/27658511.2025.2485688},
      pdf = {https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2025.2485688},
      research-theme = {water-flow, soil-structure, sustainable-agriculture}
    }
    
  • Soil Structure Changes Under Conservation Management Enhance Carbon Mineralization in Irrigated Croplands.
    AlvarezSagrero, J., Chacon, S. S., Mitchell, J., & Ghezzehei, T. A.
    Vadose Zone Journal. 2025.

    BibTeX

    Abstract

    BibTeX

    @article{p2025-Alvarez,
      title = {Soil Structure Changes Under Conservation Management Enhance Carbon Mineralization in Irrigated Croplands},
      language = {en},
      journal = {Vadose Zone Journal},
      author = {AlvarezSagrero, Jennifer and Chacon, Stephany S and Mitchell, Jeffrey and Ghezzehei, Teamrat A.},
      pages = {},
      year = {2025},
      research-theme = {soil-structure, rhizosphere, sustainable-agriculture}
    }
    
  • Commentary: Defining soil science: Balancing fundamental research and societal needs.
    Ghezzehei, T. A., & Berhe, A. A.
    Soil Science Society of America Journal, 89, e70059. 2025.

    Details BibTeX

    Abstract

    Soil science is at a critical juncture in defining its disciplinary identity. This paper critically examines a recent proposal to define the field primarily through its societal contributions, arguing that such an approach risks constraining soil science’s scientific identity. By analyzing historical perspectives and drawing parallels with other scientific disciplines, we demonstrate that transformative solutions often emerge from fundamental research. We propose a definition that positions soil science as a natural science studying the complex planetary surfaces, encompassing both living and nonliving systems, and maintaining intellectual freedom while remaining responsive to environmental challenges.

    BibTeX

    @article{Ghezzehei2025a,
      author = {Ghezzehei, Teamrat A. and Berhe, Asmeret A.},
      title = {{Commentary}: Defining soil science: Balancing fundamental research and societal needs},
      journal = {Soil Science Society of America Journal},
      volume = {89},
      pages = {e70059},
      year = {2025},
      publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
      doi = {10.1002/saj2.70059},
      pdf = {https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.70059},
      research-theme = {sustainable-agriculture}
    }
    
  • Two Decades of Conservation Agriculture Enhances Soil Structure, Carbon Sequestration, and Water Retention in Mediterranean Soils.
    Alvarez-Sagrero, J., Berhe, A. A., Chacon, S. S., Mitchell, J. P., & Ghezzehei, T. A.
    SOIL (under Review).

    Details BibTeX

    Abstract

    Conservation agriculture offers a pathway for enhancing soil health with climate co-benefits in Mediterranean agricultural systems. This study examined long-term impacts of combining no-till management with cover cropping over 20 years in California’s Central Valley, providing rare insights into soil system equilibrium under sustained conservation management. We assessed soil physical, chemical, and structural properties comparing reduced tillage with cover crops to standard tillage without cover crops, employing density fractionation and spectroscopic analysis to understand carbon protection mechanisms. After two decades, conservation agriculture achieved dynamic equilibrium characterized by fundamental shifts in carbon stabilization pathways. Water-stable aggregate analysis revealed the most pronounced management effects, with conservation practices exhibiting 136% greater stability, indicating substantial improvements in soil structural integrity. These structural enhancements corresponded with a reorganization of carbon protection mechanisms, demonstrating that physical protection within aggregates becomes a dominant carbon stabilization pathway under long-term conservation management. Mineral-associated organic carbon saturation analysis revealed that both management systems remained well below theoretical maximum capacity, indicating substantial remaining potential for carbon sequestration even after reaching equilibrium. Physical property improvements included 15% lower bulk density and 13% greater water retention at field capacity. Our findings demonstrate that two decades of conservation agriculture fundamentally transforms soil functioning through aggregate-mediated physical protection.

    BibTeX

    @article{2025-AlvarezSagrero,
      title = {Two Decades of Conservation Agriculture Enhances Soil Structure, Carbon Sequestration, and Water Retention in Mediterranean Soils},
      language = {en},
      journal = {SOIL (under review)},
      author = {Alvarez-Sagrero, Jennifer and Berhe, Asmeret Asefaw and Chacon, Stephany S. and Mitchell, Jeffrey P. and Ghezzehei, Teamrat A.},
      pages = {},
      research-theme = {sustainable-agriculture, soil-structure, water-flow}
    }
    
View All Agriculture Publications →

Long-Term Experiments

  • 24-year tillage study: No-till vs. standard till
  • 24-year cover crop experiment: Tomato-corn rotation
  • Irrigation method comparison: Drip vs. furrow
  • UC Merced campus: Composting trials

Partner With Our Research

Interested in on-farm trials, conservation practice evaluation, or collaborative research on sustainable agriculture?

Contact Dr. Ghezzehei